Posts Tagged ‘Related’

Mesothelioma settlements – Asbestos Related cases – video Pursue your mesothelioma settlement today. Kazan Law will help you understand your rights as a victim of asbestos. Kazan has a long and successful history in asbestos and mesothelioma settlements. Call 877.622.5246 for a no cost evaluation about asbestos-related disease.
Video Rating: 0 / 5

Read About Asbestos Related Disease

Read About Asbestos Related Disease

Asbestos is a toxic chemical substance that has been used directly or indirectly in hundreds of products across the globe. It is incorrect and inappropriate for human beings to have excessive exposure to asbestos. This might result in malignant mesothelioma — a rare cancer that affects the lining of the lungs, abdomen or heart — and other diseases. It is amazing to find that, asbestos has still not been entirely banned in the United States, and Americans continue to risk exposure to this dangerous fiber.

If you feel that you have been exhibiting symptoms of mesothelioma (like shortness of breath, pain in the chest or back region, swelling in the abdomen, difficulty swallowing, cough, fever, sweating, fatigue, and weight loss.), it is important for you to consult your doctor immediately. There are various methods that are available for treating the victims of mesothelioma.

They are either direct methods or alternative methods. Some of the direct methods are Surgery-both Aggressive and Pallative, Chemotherapy, Radiation therapy etc. Immunoagumentive Therapy (IAT), Gene Therapy, Intraoperative Photodynamic Therapy (IPT) etc. are some of the commonly practiced alternative methods.

Also one can take the help of Support Groups, which are available to help sufferers deal with the challenges that they are facing. A recent publication says that over 20% of Americans have participated in some type of self-help group. There are mainly two types of support groups that are available namely- online support groups and community centred support groups.

If you have already been diagnosed with mesothelioma it is important for you to have a positive frame of mind and keep yourself well informed about the latest medical developments that has taken place pertaining to this field. Also as a victim of the Asbestos industry you can have certain legal and social claims. The following propositions can be considered if you are a victim of Mesothelioma caused due to negligent asbestos exposure.

1. Legal Aid and Financial Compensation

People who contract the disease must be absolutely sure that the cause for the same was asbestos exposure and then take steps to get the right legal counsel. Once the legal counsel has been retained the law will ensure that he or she gets the compensation for employers negligence if any.

2. Claim from the Asbestos Industry

Mesothelioma victims have the option to claim large monetary compensation from the asbestos industry. These claims can go into the millions of dollars depending on the rights and cause of the claims. A Law firm that specializes in mesothelioma cases ensures that the families of victims gets ample compensation.

3. Claim Social Security Disability

Victims can claim social security disability after getting advice from an attorney that specializes in these cases.

4. Disability Insurance

You are legally entailed to claim disability insurance if you have disability insurance either privately procured, within your life insurance policy or through your employer.

5.Worker’s Compensation

It is one of the core responsibilities of an employer to take care of its employees. Thus, even while the victim takes legal action against the asbestos industry he or she can simultaneously claim workers compensation for being ‘disabled’ during work. A lawyer who has experience in the asbestos industry should handle this sort of claim.

6. Health Insurance

A victim of mesothelioma can incur huge medical bills due to the expensive nature of treatment that’s required for the treatment of this disease. If a victim is admitted to the hospital he or she should talk to the Discharge Planner or other personnel who can help with hospice and hospital coverage. Laws cover medial treatments and action can be taken health insurance company if they fail to provide proper coverage. Again it is imperative to ensure that the victim employs a proper legal representative.

Information on types of ocd can be found at the Health And Nutrition Tips site.

Article from

Related Mesothelioma Causes Articles

The Importance of Exposure Levels Regarding Asbestos Related Mortality

The Importance of Exposure Levels Regarding Asbestos Related Mortality

Some research has shown a correlation between high exposure rates to asbestos with a significant excess of cancer related deaths.  Just how much impact do exposure levels really have on mortality?

One interesting study is called, “Lung cancer among asbestos cement workers. A Swedish cohort study and a review.” By C G Ohlson, C Hogstedt  – Br J Ind Med 1985;42:397-402.  Here is an excerpt:  “Abstract – A cohort study of 1176 Swedish asbestos cement workers did not indicate any asbestos related excess mortality. Possible explanations of the negative outcome are relatively low exposure levels and the predominant use of chrysotile in production. Such a tentative conclusion is supported by a review of five mortality studies of workers exposed to asbestos cement that report considerable differences in relative risks for lung cancer. These differences could be explained by various degrees of cumulative exposure, the amount of amphiboles in the production, and methodological shortcomings. A median exposure of 10-20 fibre-years does not seem to cause an increased risk of lung cancer, particularly when only chrysotile is used.”

A second study is called, “A study of the mortality of workers in an asbestos factory” by   M. L. Newhouse  Br J Ind Med 1969;26:294-301.  Here is an excerpt: “Abstract – A study of the mortality of workers in an asbestos factory. A cohort study of over 4,500 male workers employed at an asbestos factory making both textiles and insulation materials is described. The main analysis of the mortality of workers employed between April 1, 1933, the date of the implementation of the Asbestos Regulations, and May 1, 1964. The analysis was made in relation to job, length of exposure, and length of follow-up after first exposure. There was no significant difference between the number of deaths occurring in the factory population and the national figures, until an interval of 16 years or longer had elapsed from first exposure in the factory. There were 1,160 men who fulfilled this criterion. In this group there was no excess mortality among those who worked in jobs where exposure was low or moderate, but among those with jobs which entailed heavy exposure there was a significant excess of deaths from cancer of the lung and pleura, and cancer of other sites, in men with a total period of employment in the factory of less than two years, as well as with those who worked for longer. Excess mortality from respiratory disease was observed only among severely exposed workers with long service.”

A third study is called, “The effects of long-term ingestion of asbestos on the colon of F344 rats” by Kelley J. Donham, MS, DVM,  John W. Berg, MD, Loren A. Will, DVM, MPh§, Joel R. Leininger, DVM, PhD, – Department of Preventive Medicine and Environmental Health, College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa – National Large Bowel Cancer Project – Here is an excerpt: “Abstract – Weanling F344 rats, which were fed a diet containing 10% chrysotile (B), were studied over their lifetime to determine the effects of ingested asbestos on the colon. Control groups consisted of rats fed a diet containing a 10% nonnutritive cellulose or a standard laboratory rat diet. The pathological findings in the colons of 501 rats (189 on asbestos diet, 197 on fiber control diet, and 115 on standard control diet), are reported here. Epithelial tumors of the colon (eight adenocarcinomas and one adenoma) were found in nine of the rats on study. Four of the tumors were in asbestos-fed rats, two tumors were found in the non-nutritive cellulose controls, and three tumors were found in the standard laboratory rat diet controls. The probability (based on actuarial analysis) of developing adenoma or adenocarcinomas during the 32 months of the study were 7.4% for the asbestos-fed group, 3.5% for the fiber control diet and 4.0% on the standard control diet. In addition, one malignant mesothelioma of the type induced by intraperitoneally administered asbestos was found in the asbestos-fed group. Non-neoplastic lesions of the colon were also evaluated. The cumulative risk for development of any colon-associated lesion (non-neoplastic plus neoplastic lesions) was greatest for asbestos-fed rats (17.9%), compared to 13.6% for those fed the fiber control diet and 8.2% for those fed the standard control diet. The colon tissue levels of adenosine, 3-5-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) were significantly lower in the animals fed asbestos compared to the control diets. Chrysotile fibers were seen by electronmicroscopy (e.m.) in six of ten ashed colon specimens of rats fed the asbestos diet. Although the differences in numbers of tumors between the animals fed asbestos and the controls were not statistically significant at the 5% level, we felt that the combination of observations including 1) evidence of increased probability of asbestos-fed animals to develop colon lesions in general; 2) evidence of a special type of mesothelioma in rats fed asbestos; 3) evidence for a cell regulator defect (lowered cAMP levels) in colon tissues of animals fed asbestos; and 4) evidence for asbestos fiber penetration of the colonic mucosa (e.m. studies) suggest that ingested asbestos is not inert in the colon.”

If you found any of these excerpts interesting, please read the studies in their entirety.  We all owe a debt of gratitude to these researchers. – Get Extensive Information on Mesothelioma and Related Topics – Get Extensive Information on Mesothelioma and Related Topics

Amongst all three types of cancers caused by asbestos, pericardial is the rarest form. Pericardial mesothelioma accounts for less than 10% of all mesothelioma cases worldwide. It is known as pericardial mesothelioma because it attacks the pericardium which is the lining of the heart. According to the doctors, pericardial mesothelioma is the most dangerous type of mesothelioma merely because it revolves around the heart.

Causes of pericardial mesothelioma:
People who usually work in factories or industries that have to do a lot with asbestos fibers are the ones developing pericardial mesothelioma. Uptil now asbestos has been declared as the only reason causing pericardial mesothelioma.

There is no accurate answer as to how pericardial mesothelioma is developed inside the human body. Nobody yet has noted how the asbestos fibers make their way into the pericardium. However, researchers say that asbestos fibers are inhaled through breathing and break up into small pieces. These pieces are then carried from the lungs into the blood stream. When these fibers are pumped into the heart they may get stuck in the heart lining. Once they are there in pericardium, the inflammation process starts leading to the formation of cancerous growths or tumors.

Symptoms of pericardial mesothelioma:
The growth of tumors in the pericardial region makes the tissues expand and allows the fluid to gather around the heart. This fluid can interfere with the heart’s functioning. Also, this fluid is responsible for most of the symptoms of the pericardial mesothelioma. Symptoms of pericardial mesothelioma include:

-    shortness of breath
-    intense fatigue after nominal activity or exertion
-    chest pain
-    heart palpitations
-    persistent coughing

Pericardial mesothelioma bears resemblance to the other kinds of mesothelioma in which the symptoms are usually mistaken for something more common. In pericardial mesothelioma, heart attacks or other sort of heart diseases are suspected, especially when the patient begins complaining of constant chest pains.
The symptoms of pericardial mesothelioma vary depending upon the patient. Also they are affected by a number of factors such as the location and the size of the tumors and the overall heath.

Katie has been working with various Medical & Health organizations providing them reports on Medicines & Cancer diseases particularly focused on mesothlioma. Therefore, she has a great insight over the issues, treatment and cure of the diseases.

Article from

Occupational Illness – Work related compensation claims – My name is Emma Costin and I am Head of the Occupational Disease Department at Simpson Millar. Most people know what is meant by a personal injury but I am not so sure regarding occupational disease. We deal with a wide range of diseases, the most common of which are probably the asbestos related illnesses such as asbestosis, diffused pleural thickening, mesothelioma, asbestos lung cancer but also work related deafness, dermatitis which can be caused for example by exposure to latex or cleaning chemicals or even hairdressing chemicals at work, also occupational cancers including those caused by radiation and exposure to poisonous chemicals. We also deal with stress at work claims and repetitive strain injury claims as well as vibration white finger and other neurological diseases caused by exposure to work equipment over a prolonged period of time. We have a specialist department at Simpson Millar that deals with occupational diseases distinct from any other departments because there are a number of issues related to occupational disease claims that are specialist. In particular, the exposure to the dangerous chemical or substance or work process typically took place either over a long prolonged period of time or many years ago so we can be dealing with companies or employers who have long since been dissolved or taken over, that means that we have to be specialists in tracing what has become of those companies and also their insurers, and having Law Offices of Michael R. Bilbrey, PC alerts audiences about lung cancer and how they can help you. This commercial was created by MCM and edited with Charter Media.

There is a Cancer Epidemic Related to Asbestos Exposure

There is a Cancer Epidemic Related to Asbestos Exposure

There is a Cancer Epidemic Related to Asbestos Exposure

Asbestos exposure is responsible for the death of millions of people worldwide and the debate on how to handle this crisis is still ongoing.  There are a myriad of political and economic obstacles surrounding the issue, and some are uncomfortable subjects to discuss.

One interesting article to start your research is called, “The asbestos cancer epidemic.” By Joseph LaDou – Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of California-San Francisco School of Medicine, – Environ Health Perspect. 2004 March; 112(3): 285–.  Here is an excerpt: “The asbestos cancer epidemic may take as many as 10 million lives before asbestos is banned worldwide and exposures are brought to an end. In many developed countries, in the most affected age groups, mesothelioma may account for 1% of all deaths. In addition to mesotheliomas, 5-7% of all lung cancers can be attributed to occupational exposures to asbestos. The asbestos cancer epidemic would have been largely preventable if the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Labor Organization (ILO) had responded early and responsibly.

The WHO was late in recognizing the epidemic and failed to act decisively after it was well under way. The WHO and the ILO continue to fail to address the problem of asbestos mining, manufacturing, and use and world trade of a known human carcinogen. Part of the problem is that the WHO and the ILO have allowed organizations such as the International Commission on Occupational Health (ICOH) and other asbestos industry advocates to manipulate them and to distort scientific evidence. The global asbestos cancer epidemic is a story of monumental failure to protect the public health.”

A second study worth examining is called, “Cancer in asbestos-exposed occupational cohorts: a meta-analysis” Cancer Causes and Control – Volume 10, Number 5 / August, 1999 – by Michael Goodman, Robert W. Morgan, Rose Ray, Curtis D. Malloy  and Ke Zhao.  Here is an excerpt: “Abstract  Objective: To examine existing asbestos-exposed occupational cohorts and apply a meta-analytic technique to determine the magnitude of association between exposure and lung cancer and to investigate other cancer sites that may be related to such an exposure.  Methods: We summarized the data from 69 asbestos-exposed occupational cohorts reporting on cancer morbidity and mortality. Data were extracted regarding numbers of deaths for each cancer, numbers of mesotheliomas, occupations and latency for respiratory, gastrointestinal, urinary and lymphohematopoietic cancers. For each cancer, we calculated a meta-SMR and examined heterogeneity of results using a chi-square test and by calculating a Z-statistic for each study. To examine the dose–response effect, we divided the studies into tertiles according to the percentage of mesothelioma deaths that served as a proxy estimation of asbestos exposure.

Results: Lung cancer data demonstrated meta-SMRs of 163 and 148 with and without latency, respectively, with significant heterogeneity of results even after stratification according to occupational groups. Stratification of lung cancer studies according to percentage of mesothelioma deaths showed a dose–response effect. Z-scores ranged from – 12.21 to + 29.49. Analysis for laryngeal cancer yielded meta-SMRs of 157 and 133 with and without latency, respectively, demonstrating homogeneous results across studies but accompanied by no evidence of a dose–response effect. Data for gastrointestinal cancers showed no evidence of a significant association and no dose–response effect. Kidney cancer demonstrated statistically non-significant meta-SMRs of 120 (95% CI 88–160) and 111 (95% CI 94–131) with and without latency respectively.
Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates a wide variability of the association between occupational asbestos and lung cancer. There was a suggestion of an association between asbestos and laryngeal carcinoma and no clear association with other cancers.”

A third study is called, “Asbestos and renal adenocarcinoma: A case-control study” by  Malcolm Maclure – Environmental Research Volume 42, Issue 2, April 1987, Pages 353.  Here is an excerpt:  “A case-control study of renal adenocarcinoma has corroborated the hypothesis that asbestos is a cause of the disease. The odds of having been moderately or heavily exposed to asbestos 30 years before diagnosis were 45:473 among cases, whereas the comparable odds among controls were 26:492. A matched-pair analysis yielded an exposure odds ratio of 1.8 with 95% confidence limits of 1.1 and 3.1. After controlling for potential confounders and selection factors by means of logistic regression, the incidence rate ratio was estimated to be 1.6, with a one-sided 95% confidence limit of 1.0.”

If you found any of these excerpts interesting, please read the studies in their entirety.  We all owe a great deal of gratitude to these researchers.