Posts Tagged ‘there’

Everything There Is To Know About ”personal Injury”

Everything There Is To Know About ”personal Injury”

In most cases, peoples perception about “personal injury” is limited only in terms of  its legalities. Although this legal term has usually been the content of television news and other print media, still our our understanding on the legal grounds of personal injury is quite limited.Of course, personal injury involves an injury implicted to a person, but there is more to know and understand about its legalities

Usually, personal injury involves an injury implicted to the physical body and sometimes it may also be a psychological injury, such as extreme stress at work. In cases wherein the injury was caused by another person or the company, that person or company may be legally responsible for the expenses of treating the injury. Thus, the service of an attorney who specialized in this particular area is highly demanded. And with the help of the attorney, the injured person will receive a just compensation of the injury implicted to him.

Negligence usually results to personal injury. As an example of negligence, in a grocery store someone had left a spill on the floor without mopping it up. As a result, somebody slips on it and breaks a leg. In another case, an employer may have failed to repair equipment regularly, causing an employee to be injured, or a nurse at a hospital may have given a patient the wrong medication.

There is a what we call  “claim” against the party responsible for the injury. Car accidents, slip and fall accidents, and accidents at work are the most common results of personal injury claims. However, personal injury claims are classified in numerous kinds. These injury types varies from toxic substances to medical malpractice claims. In cases wherein the injury results to death of the injured person, the claim may then be brought by the relatives of the person who died and the claim is called “wrongful death.”

Another category of personal injury are diseases like asbestosis and mesothelioma,caused by industrial substances. These instances could have been prevented if the substances were not left unattended and had been cleared from the workplace area.

A tort, not the pastry, is a legal term that means a “wrong” that has been done. A  “tortfeasor” is person who committed the tort either on purpose or through negligence. In order to have committed a tort,the tortfeasor must owe a duty to the injure person such as making sure that the sidewalk in front of a business is free of hazards, such as ice or broken concrete.

Mostly, in personal injury cases the insurance company who paid in behalf of the responsible parties usually pay the settlement as little as possible. The ”settlement” is the money receives by the the injured person. And for this reason, many victims of personal injury choose to hire a lawyer in order to have a fair settlement.

If you have some cases of personal injury, it would be much better to learn and make yourself aware of your legal rights and get the compensation you deserve.

Mae Sta. Maria is a writer who admired most the profession of a Personal Injury Lawyer and an Auto Accident Attorney, that’s why she showed great interest in reading and writing articles related to Personal Injury topics.


Article from articlesbase.com

There Are Many Different Types of Cancer

There Are Many Different Types of Cancer

In its most general terms, cancer is a word used to describe the occurrence of cells in any part of the body or on the external skin to grow out of control and in a dis-ordered manner. Normal cells are able to regulate their growth and division, but cancer cells do not have this ability. There are many different types of cancer, many of which are more treatable than others, but all forms of cancer share at least one common feature: they are abnormal cells.


Sometimes, different types of cancer consist of very different types of abnormal cells. This is why different types of cancer are treated with different medications and procedures. For example, the treatment for breast cancer is completely different from the treatment a mesothelioma patient receives.


In terms of mesothelioma, a tumor begins to form when the cells on the mesothelium begin to grow abnormally and out of control. Normally, these abnormal cells do not know how to stop dividing and they grow and grow until a lump or a tumor can be seen. Eventually, the tumors begin to inhibit the functioning of the normal cells. When this occurs, a person’s body does not work as it should, and the person becomes dangerously ill.


Mesothelioma is a cancer that produces tumors, and when just a few cells from the tumor break away and travel through the blood stream, they can land in another area and begin growing. This is called metastasis, and is an extremely common occurrence with malignant mesothelioma.


The general public is constantly cautioned about what causes an increased risk of developing cancer. In general, risk factors boil down to habits (i.e. smoking and drinking, excessive sun exposure), family history, health conditions, and the environment in which a person works and lives. In the case of mesothelioma, it has been determined that almost every single case is due to the unprotected exposure and inhalation of asbestos particles at any time during a person’s life.


A diagnosis of any form of cancer, including mesothelioma, can only be diagnosed by way of a biopsy. For a biopsy, doctor will take a tiny sample of the cells causing a lump, tumor or suspicious group of cells, and look at it under microscope. While tests such as x-rays and other imaging scans can see masses or lumps, they can not determine the type of cells that make up abnormal growths. When a doctor looks at the cells under a microscope, it can be determined if the cells are cancerous, and usually what type of cancer is present.

http://www.mesotheliomadoctorsandlawyers.com is your definitive source for information involving the deadly disease known as mesothelioma.


Article from articlesbase.com

There is a Cancer Epidemic Related to Asbestos Exposure

There is a Cancer Epidemic Related to Asbestos Exposure

There is a Cancer Epidemic Related to Asbestos Exposure

Asbestos exposure is responsible for the death of millions of people worldwide and the debate on how to handle this crisis is still ongoing.  There are a myriad of political and economic obstacles surrounding the issue, and some are uncomfortable subjects to discuss.

One interesting article to start your research is called, “The asbestos cancer epidemic.” By Joseph LaDou – Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of California-San Francisco School of Medicine, – Environ Health Perspect. 2004 March; 112(3): 285–.  Here is an excerpt: “The asbestos cancer epidemic may take as many as 10 million lives before asbestos is banned worldwide and exposures are brought to an end. In many developed countries, in the most affected age groups, mesothelioma may account for 1% of all deaths. In addition to mesotheliomas, 5-7% of all lung cancers can be attributed to occupational exposures to asbestos. The asbestos cancer epidemic would have been largely preventable if the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Labor Organization (ILO) had responded early and responsibly.

The WHO was late in recognizing the epidemic and failed to act decisively after it was well under way. The WHO and the ILO continue to fail to address the problem of asbestos mining, manufacturing, and use and world trade of a known human carcinogen. Part of the problem is that the WHO and the ILO have allowed organizations such as the International Commission on Occupational Health (ICOH) and other asbestos industry advocates to manipulate them and to distort scientific evidence. The global asbestos cancer epidemic is a story of monumental failure to protect the public health.”

A second study worth examining is called, “Cancer in asbestos-exposed occupational cohorts: a meta-analysis” Cancer Causes and Control – Volume 10, Number 5 / August, 1999 – by Michael Goodman, Robert W. Morgan, Rose Ray, Curtis D. Malloy  and Ke Zhao.  Here is an excerpt: “Abstract  Objective: To examine existing asbestos-exposed occupational cohorts and apply a meta-analytic technique to determine the magnitude of association between exposure and lung cancer and to investigate other cancer sites that may be related to such an exposure.  Methods: We summarized the data from 69 asbestos-exposed occupational cohorts reporting on cancer morbidity and mortality. Data were extracted regarding numbers of deaths for each cancer, numbers of mesotheliomas, occupations and latency for respiratory, gastrointestinal, urinary and lymphohematopoietic cancers. For each cancer, we calculated a meta-SMR and examined heterogeneity of results using a chi-square test and by calculating a Z-statistic for each study. To examine the dose–response effect, we divided the studies into tertiles according to the percentage of mesothelioma deaths that served as a proxy estimation of asbestos exposure.

Results: Lung cancer data demonstrated meta-SMRs of 163 and 148 with and without latency, respectively, with significant heterogeneity of results even after stratification according to occupational groups. Stratification of lung cancer studies according to percentage of mesothelioma deaths showed a dose–response effect. Z-scores ranged from – 12.21 to + 29.49. Analysis for laryngeal cancer yielded meta-SMRs of 157 and 133 with and without latency, respectively, demonstrating homogeneous results across studies but accompanied by no evidence of a dose–response effect. Data for gastrointestinal cancers showed no evidence of a significant association and no dose–response effect. Kidney cancer demonstrated statistically non-significant meta-SMRs of 120 (95% CI 88–160) and 111 (95% CI 94–131) with and without latency respectively.
Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates a wide variability of the association between occupational asbestos and lung cancer. There was a suggestion of an association between asbestos and laryngeal carcinoma and no clear association with other cancers.”

A third study is called, “Asbestos and renal adenocarcinoma: A case-control study” by  Malcolm Maclure – Environmental Research Volume 42, Issue 2, April 1987, Pages 353.  Here is an excerpt:  “A case-control study of renal adenocarcinoma has corroborated the hypothesis that asbestos is a cause of the disease. The odds of having been moderately or heavily exposed to asbestos 30 years before diagnosis were 45:473 among cases, whereas the comparable odds among controls were 26:492. A matched-pair analysis yielded an exposure odds ratio of 1.8 with 95% confidence limits of 1.1 and 3.1. After controlling for potential confounders and selection factors by means of logistic regression, the incidence rate ratio was estimated to be 1.6, with a one-sided 95% confidence limit of 1.0.”

If you found any of these excerpts interesting, please read the studies in their entirety.  We all owe a great deal of gratitude to these researchers.

Is There a Mesothelioma Cure?

Is There a Mesothelioma Cure?

Let’s see if we can determine whether or not there is a mesothelioma cure. In this day and age it can seem absurd that there are no cures for cancer let alone a mesothelioma cure. Mesothelioma is a cancer, and as such, there is no true “cure” for it yet. However, if the disease is caught early, various treatment options can not only extend a patient’s life, but also their quality of life. While the traditional survival rate for those diagnosed with mesothelioma is often set at eight to 12 months, more recently, a five year survival rate of some has increased substantially. This goes to show that treatment and drugs to battle mesothelioma cancer has increased and improved dramatically in the last few years. This may be due to the fact that more is known about mesothelioma cancer now than it ever was before.

However, there is still much to be understood about this aggressive disease. While the common diagnosis for mesothelioma is that it is indeed a form of cancer, not all researchers are in agreement. So as of yet there are no mesothelioma cure that has been developed; however there are things that people can do to ease any symptoms that they have. Your doctor or health professional will be able to help ease the symptoms and make the last few years or months a lot easier.

Some people think that mesothelioma cancer is a viral infection that has turned malignant. Thus, their prognosis is that the asbestos fibers which cause the disease could possibly activate an already present common virus infection, and eventually cause a variety of clinical conditions for the patient. While many of these clinical conditions may appear to not be harmful, in benign pleural effusions researchers don’t typically find what is known as a pleural cavity that is then full of asbestos needles. Consequently, researchers either aren’t culturing for the right agent, or they need more time to conduct broader research about the true nature of Mesothelioma.

Finally, here are some known medical facts that are not particularly common about Mesothelioma cancer:

• It is extremely rare for the Serosal membranes to be malignant other than with Mesothelioma cancer.

• It is not asbestos dependent.

• It is not smoking related.

• It only really happens when there is evidence of pleurisy.

• The latency period is longer than any other known malignancy.

While these facts contain specific, medical, terminology which some may be unfamiliar with, it is important to present the terminology as it known; scientifically. While the personal diagnosis, or that of a loved one, with mesothelioma can already seem like a devastating occurrence, it is important for people to educate themselves more specifically about such terms. This will assist both the patient, and their loved ones, to better understand the disease they are battling, and to more effectively communicate with their physicians regarding mesothelioma.

If you have been exposed to asbestos and would like to know more about mesothelioma or treatment for asbestos cancer . Also feel free to contact us if you are looking for a mesothelioma lawyer


Article from articlesbase.com

Related Mesothelioma Cure Articles

Do you think whenever “scientific” studies are published to the general public, there is a hidden agenda?

Question by Poyzin: Do you think whenever “scientific” studies are published to the general public, there is a hidden agenda?
For example, this moronic study http://www.aolnews.com/health/article/study-in-singapore-links-sugary-soft-drinks-and-pancreatic-cancer/19348936?icid=main|main|dl1|link1|http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aolnews.com%2Fhealth%2Farticle%2Fstudy-in-singapore-links-sugary-soft-drinks-and-pancreatic-cancer%2F19348936

Claims sugar causes cancer – if the sugar is in the form of soda pop. So you find out where the study came from and it’s from the government of Singapore – the country that whips you with 7 foot long Ratton canes soaked in water on the bare assss if you spit on the sidewalk.
You obviously can’t trust THAT study.

Similarly, the global warming scam – government-sponsored “scientists’ using back-filled data and 100 iterations to reach the pre-determined “conclusion”.

The cell phone cancer scare, funded by trial lawyers, salivating over the next “asbestos” type lawsuit lottery.

It never stops. Should we conclude that all “scientific” studies that are widely published on lowest common denominator sites like AOL and Yahoo news are fraudulent?

Best answer:

Answer by Ratz
Uh, no, that study is not “published” to the public, it’s published in a science journal ( http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/ ) and reported on AOL. You aren’t a very good reader as the study acknowledges,

“But the study isn’t a definitive answer. Out of the 60,000 individuals studied, 140 developed pancreatic cancer. Of those, 18 cases occurred in patients who’d consumed large quantities of soda, 12 occurred in those who drank soda occasionally, and 110 occurred in those who never consumed the sugary beverages.

In their analysis, the researchers acknowledge that the small numbers limit the power of the data, and “giv[e] potential to a chance association.” The team also cites four previous studies that found little or no connection between soda and pancreatic cancer.

There are a handful of definitive or suggested causes for pancreatic cancer, making this study even more difficult to interpret. Aside from red meat consumption, smoking and diabetes, risk factors include genetics, ethnicity, old age, obesity and even excessive alcohol consumption.”

Add your own answer in the comments!

Do you think whenever “studies” are published to the general public, there is a hidden agenda?

Question by Poyzin: Do you think whenever “studies” are published to the general public, there is a hidden agenda?
For example, this moronic study http://www.aolnews.com/health/article/study-in-singapore-links-sugary-soft-drinks-and-pancreatic-cancer/19348936?icid=main|main|dl1|link1|http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aolnews.com%2Fhealth%2Farticle%2Fstudy-in-singapore-links-sugary-soft-drinks-and-pancreatic-cancer%2F19348936

Claims sugar causes cancer – if it’s in the form of soda pop. So you find out where the study came from and it’s from the government of Singapore – the country that whips you with 7 foot long Ratton canes soaked in water on the bare assss if you spit on the sidewalk.
You obviously can’t trust THAT study.

Similarly, the global warming scam – government-sponsored “scientists’ using back-filled data and 100 iterations to reach the pre-determined “conclusion”.

The cell phone cancer scare, funded by trial lawyers, salivating over the next “asbestos” type lawsuit lottery.

It never stops. Should we conclude that all “scientific” studies that are widely published on lowest common denominator sites like AOL and Yahoo news are fraudulent?

Best answer:

Answer by Nesquick
I wouldn’t past the powers that be to abuse these “studies” for the sake of profit.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Categories